(Haida Gwaii Observer/File photo)

Appeals court upholds existing two-stage plan for Haida title case

Judges dismiss a Haida Nation appeal to keep phase one focused on a broad declaration of rights

The Haida Nation has lost an appeal about how the Haida title case will go to trial.

Given how complicated it is, the Haida, B.C., and Canadian governments all agreed it would save time and money to hear the case in two phases.

The hope is that if phase one goes well, the parties can settle without phase two, or can at least keep it short.

But the parties disagreed on what each phase would deal with.

Writing last Tuesday as part of a three-judge panel with the B.C. Court of Appeal, Justice John Hunter said that first of all, higher courts can only overrule the way a trial court judge chooses to hear a case if there is a serious injustice or error in principle.

“For the reasons given in this judgement, I am of the view that no error of law or principle has been established to warrant interference by this Court,” he said.

Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2018 BCCA 462 by Haida Gwaii Observer on Scribd

In its appeal, the Haida Nation argued that the way the trial judge organized the case would lead to a return of the so-called “small spots” or “postage-stamp” approach to Aboriginal rights.

That is an approach where courts only consider specific Aboriginal rights to specific parts of a territory, which has the effect of freezing the rights in time and narrowing them to particular areas.

But Justice Hunter and the other Court of Appeal judges said that is not the trial judge’s intention.

Related: Haida title case to be heard in two phases

Although the case will deal with some specific issues in phase one — alleged damages to five marine species, one forest area, and seven properties over which the Haida Nation claims title — they said the idea is not to take a “postage stamp” approach, but to look closely at a few examples of alleged damages so any remedies can be scaled-up to account for the whole of Haida Gwaii.

The Court of Appeal judges also found that in the context of a lawsuit such as the Haida title case, courts can’t declare Aboriginal rights in the broad, abstract way the Haida Nation was seeking to do in phase one, without also considering possible justifications that the B.C. or Canadian governments may have had for infringing those rights.

Although Section 35 of Canada’s 1982 Constitution Act includes protections for Aboriginal title and rights, it does not strictly define them. They are instead defined on a case-by-case basis.

On that point, Justice Hunter followed the trial judge in quoting an earlier court decision where the Cheslatta Carrier First Nation sought a court declaration that it has an existing Aboriginal right to carry out Cheslatta fisheries.

“It is clear that any aboriginal ‘right to fish’ that might be subject of a declaration would not be absolute,” wrote the judge in Cheslatta.

“Like other rights, such a right may be subject to infringement or restriction by government where such infringement is justified.”

“The point is that the definition of the circumstances in which infringement is justified is an important part of defining the right itself.”

While the provincial government sought to uphold the existing organization for the case, the federal government did not take a position on the issue.


Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Single-engine aircraft crashes near Telkwa

Two occupants of the plane sustained minor injuries and were transported to hospital

Cullen announces bid for provincial NDP nomination for Stikine riding

Current MLA Donaldson not seeking re-election

Northern Health records 1st fatality due to COVID-19

Six people died from the novel coronavirus on the weekend, health officials confirm

Police look for vehicle, male driver after incident involving girl, 11

The driver was described as an older Caucasian male with white hair, no glasses, and no facial hair

Anger growing among B.C. salmon anglers shut out of public fishery

Fisheries minister stands by “very difficult” decisions to limit openings

3 new deaths due to COVID-19 in B.C., 139 new cases

B.C. confirms 40 ‘historic cases,’ as well

Ferry riders say lower fares are what’s most needed to improve service

Provincial government announces findings of public engagement process

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies at 87

The court’s second female justice, died Friday at her home in Washington

Application deadline for fish harvester benefits program extended

Those financially impacted by the pandemic have until Oct. 5 to apply

Emaciated grizzly found dead on central B.C. coast as low salmon count sparks concern

Grizzly was found on Gwa’sala-‘Nakwaxda’xw territory in Smith Inlet, 60K north of Port Hardy

VIDEO: B.C. to launch mouth-rinse COVID-19 test for kids

Test involves swishing and gargling saline in mouth and no deep-nasal swab

Young Canadians have curtailed vaping during pandemic, survey finds

The survey funded by Heart & Stroke also found the decrease in vaping frequency is most notable in British Columbia and Ontario

B.C. teachers file Labour Relations Board application over COVID-19 classroom concerns

The application comes as B.C.’s second week of the new school year comes to a close

CHARTS: Beyond Metro Vancouver, COVID-19 cases in B.C. haven’t increased much recently

COVID-19 case counts outside of Metro Vancouver have been level since July

Most Read