STV referendum Tuesday as well

  • May. 11, 2005 6:00 p.m.

By Mariah McCooey–Be prepared – the provincial election ballot is going to look different.
In addition to the usual selection of candidates, there will be a yes/no referendum question on a proposed new system of electing our provincial legislature.
So that you aren’t left standing there on election day, scratching your head with your mini pencil, here is an overview of what the proposed system entails.
The Single Transferable Vote system was proposed by the Citizen’s Assembly on Electoral Reform, a randomly selected non-partisan group of citizens from around the province. The assembly spent ten months studying different electoral systems, and assessing whether or not our current “first past the post” system accurately represents British Columbians. Their conclusion was a resounding “no” – they voted 146 to 7 in favour of adopting a new system.
This new system, called “BC-STV” for short, would come into effect in the 2009 election if the referendum passes. The main difference would be the way the electoral boundaries are drawn up. Ridings would be geographically larger, with more than one MLA representing each one. Densely populated regions in the Lower Mainland would have up to seven MLAs, whereas sparsely populated ones – such as our own – would have two. For example, five electoral ridings might be consolidated, and given five representatives. BC-STV would not change the proportion of citizens to elected members, and the number of MLA’s in the legislature would also remain the same.
The other main difference would be the actual slate of candidates running, and the way in which you choose them. Instead of just an “X” beside the candidate you prefer, you will be asked to rank candidates in the order of preference: first, second, third, and so on as far or as little as you choose. You would still be able to just choose one if you wanted, (by putting a “1” beside the candidate you prefer) but being able to rank your choices means that if your first-choice candidate doesn’t win, at least your second-choice one might. In addition, there could be numerous candidates on the ballot running for the same party.
When the ballots are being totaled up, your vote would go through several rounds, where the candidate with the lowest number of #1 rankings would be taken out of the running, and the totals re-calculated as many times as it takes to end up with a majority of votes.
Not surprisingly, one of the main criticisms of this system is that it is complicated. According to some, it is extremely complicated, and could lead to more spoiled ballots. But Ireland has been using a similar system for over eighty years, despite several referendums where the STV system was put up on the block.
Another criticism is that the proposed BC-STV would reduce regional representation. In a riding with 5 MLAs, they would nonetheless be expected to equally represent all of their constituents, even though there would be many more of them. The islands, for example, would probably become part of a much larger area including vastly differing interests – which could compromise our representation as a distinct region.
There are other places in the world that use STV, including Australia, Malta, Ireland, and several municipalities worldwide. If implemented, BC would be the first province in Canada to change its system from “first past the post.”
In fact, BC has already had an STV-like system. In 1952, the Liberal-Conservative coalition government put the single transferable vote in place, because they thought it would shut out the socialist CCF. They assumed voters would choose either Liberal or Conservative, and then one or the other as second choices, which would guarantee their continued electoral success. But they were wrong, and the 1952 election actually marked the beginning of Social Credit’s long reign.
So why the change? What’s wrong with the current system?
Right now in BC, we use “first past the post,” which means the candidate with the most votes wins, regardless of the total number of votes cast. For example, this means that if there were four candidates running, one of them could win with as little as 30-percent of the popular vote-meaning that a party can get a majority of seats in the House with the support of less than 50 percent of the population.
With a majority, the governing party is able to pass almost any piece of legislation it pleases. One of the main arguments for BC-STV is that it would be less likely to produce majority governments – forcing parties to compromise and negotiate more. According to the Citizens’ Assembly, this means that a party’s share of seats in the legislature would more accurately reflect its share of voter support.
Another “pro” for STV is that it would reduce the need to vote strategically, essentially throwing away a vote. For example, you might vote for the NDP, even though you really support the Green Party, to make sure the Liberals don’t win, etc. With BC-STV, theoretically anyway, you could simply vote for the candidate you want to win.
No system is perfect – but it’s up to you to decide whether this one would be an improvement on the current system. You’ll have your say on election day.

Just Posted

Masset fishing derby proves to be a catch

All ages participated in the competition to bring in the top salmon and halibut hauls

Yarn Bombing mastermind is back in town

Big Canada Day longweekend in the works

Maritime Museum project receives legacy grant

A special project of the Dixon Entrance Maritime Museum Society has been… Continue reading

Richardson Ranch celebrating 100 years of family and ranching in Haida Gwaii

Tlell Polled Hereford’s continue to win awards while the ranch becomes a popular spot for visitors

Sustainble economy flourishing in Haida Gwaii and Great Bear Rainforest thanks to First Nations investments

From 2008-2018, funding initiatives led to more than $286 million in new investments

VIDEO: Trans Mountain expansion project gets green light, again

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced the decision in Ottawa on Tuesday afternoon

MPs hear retired B.C. nurse’s petition to change compensation for fatal medical errors

Teri McGrath wants provinces to implement no-fault system for medical errors

Horgan says he’ll still defend B.C. coast after second Trans Mountain approval

Meanwhile, one B.C. First Nation has announced plans for a legal challenge

Demonstrators on either side of Trans Mountain debate clash in Vancouver

Crowd heard from member of Indigenous-led coalition that hopes to buy 51% of expansion project

Grieving B.C. mom hopes Facebook message leads to new investigation into son’s Surrey homicide

Criminal Justice Branch didn’t lay charges, concluding no substantial likelihood of murder or manslaughter conviction

B.C.’s measles vaccination program gains traction in May

More than 15,000 doses of the MMR vaccine has been administered across the province

B.C. farmers concerned Agricultural Land Reserve changes choking their livelihood

Dozens voice concerns at special meeting hosted on Vancouver Island

UPDATE: Two-year-old involved in Chilliwack pool drowning has died

Toddler was reported to not be breathing as air ambulance called out Thursday afternoon

Family frustrated Terrace dad with advanced cancer must wait weeks for treatment

‘We can see his health declining every day,’ daughter says

Most Read